three Recommendations for Provide Chain Threat Management Amid Vaping-Associated Lung Illnesses in the U.S.



The question of what’s behind the spate of vaping-related pulmonary diseases in the U.S. and Canada is vexing broad swaths of the cannabis industry. With vaping products rising in popularity and sales, there’s reason to be in a defensive mode; many of the public statements about these diseases point to problems in the illicit cannabis market or in the illicit e-cigarette market, but licensed cannabis businesses are embracing a cautious attitude of open communication about their products. 

The illicit cannabis market has grown more sophisticated with the growing awareness of vaping technology and consumer choice. That gap that forms, then, is a lack of education about what constitutes a safe vaping product in a licensed cannabis market. That’s where business owners can approach this issue and draw out some transparency from the supply chain.

Ben Bodamer, an attorney in Dickinson Wright’s cannabis practice group, says that the opportunity is here to get out in front of the amorphous and uncertain public reaction to what’s become a mainstream national news story. While many cannabis brands are issuing statements about the safety of their products, there’s a more important structural and legal approach that needs to be considered. 

In the meantime, it’s worth watching how federal and state regulators handle this story.

“This isn’t really just a story about one industry,” Bodamer says. “One question is: What is the intersection between the regulatory authority of the FDA and the federally non-compliant [but] state-compliant healthcare cannabis market that is legal in 33 states? I feel we saw a tiny preview of that with what occurred with CBD final fall, exactly where the FDA commissioner sought to regulate CBD as a meals ingredient, in spite of the truth that it was technically federally non-compliant, so shouldn’t have been applied as something from a federal point of view.

“You’ve observed what’s occurred,” he continues, “where there’s full confusion and a patchwork strategy to regulation. I feel a equivalent threat is totally attainable in the context of vaping, especially if there’s not meaningful distinction amongst the situation of this illness and its origins and the extremely regulated, state-compliant cannabis marketplaces.”

“That query of provide chain threat and solution liability is one particular that I feel is quite a great deal on people’s minds. »

– Ben Bodamer, Dickinson Wright

When a great deal has been created about constituents like Vitamin E acetate located in illicit-market place cannabis vape items, the basic public has raised suspicions about vaping extra broadly. All the things beneath the sun has been rolled into this query about the security of vaping devices—including state-legal and tested cannabis items, illicit-market place vapes, flavored e-cigarettes and so on. Licensed cannabis organizations would do properly to evaluate their personal standing in the market place and speak straight to their customer base.

Currently, President Trump has pushed the FDA to crack down on flavored e-cigarettes and get rid of them from shelves in the U.S. As Bodamer points out, there’s cause to take into account a equivalent federal overreach into the state-legal cannabis space. No matter if something substantial will come about at the federal level remains unclear political momentum is moving toward items like banking reform or some semblance of states’ rights legalization, but nothing at all is specific. Cannabis organization owners have a lot to have a tendency to without the need of predicting the climate in Washington, D.C. 

“That query of provide chain threat and solution liability is one particular that I feel is quite a great deal on people’s minds,” he says, “and our guidance to clientele has been: You really should have currently been carrying out a host of items, combined with finest practices in your complete provide chain, like complying with GMP practices, regardless of the truth that they’re not expected by person states.”

It is the sort of factor enshrined in environmental well being and security tenets of the 2013 Cole Memo. Although the federal document has been rescinded, the spirit of the memorandum has persisted as a guidepost for state-licensed cannabis marketplace etiquette.

Right here, Bodamer and fellow Dickinson Wright lawyer Scot Crow offer you a handful of techniques to feel about the glaring situation of provide chain threat management.

Know Your Indemnification Provisions

“This market is extremely complicated,” Crow says, “and it is quite simple to uncover your self on the edge of a sword unintentionally due to the fact no one particular paid consideration to these provisions in the agreement due to the fact everyone’s excited to the deal.”

An indemnification provision is otherwise recognized as a hold-harmless provision. The legal language outlines who will spend for what when a conflict arises. Small business executives really should spend close consideration to any mention of indemnification in diverse scenarios. Unknown and unforeseen situations can materialize in a maturing market, and the spate of vaping-connected lung illnesses is a terrific instance.

“The extra vital factor is if I’m a dispensary, or retail operation, or I’m a production business, … is creating confident all of a sudden [that] your indemnification provisions as agreements take on a a great deal larger component of the contract,” Crow says. “If you are a vertically integrated operator, there’s genuinely no way to guard your self, other than to place in spot GMP requirements to guard your self from the solution liability claim and receiving brought into some giant class action lawsuits. But these that are in the retail or production [side of the business], these agreements have a lot extra value than what they have had historically.”

Vet Your Provide Chain

Now’s the time, if you haven’t gone by means of this method not too long ago, to get up-close and private with your provide chain and re-interrogate its trustworthiness and compliance. The shape of legal claims is a matter of debate, but class-action lawsuits have emerged in several places of the cannabis space, and it aids to recognize and address any weak spots in a business’s interactions with third-celebration vendors or in other partnerships.

JetCityImages/Adobe Stock


“First of all, we do not genuinely know adequate to know the sorts of claims that will emerge,” Bodamer says. “I know that the plaintiff’s bar is inventive, but they’re also attentive. And in this context, they’re going to be following the outcomes of ongoing investigations at the state level and at the federal level. And to the extent that [those] investigations reveal certain sources, and if these certain sources have been supplying solution to person providers, if that provide chain is in any way illegal, … I feel the ease with which the plaintiff’s bar could bring claims would go up substantially.”

Acquiring out in front of the national news narrative with public statements on social media is one particular factor displaying proof of Great Manufacturing Principles or other requirements and certifications will make a clear statement to the customer base—and to public officials and private attorneys interested in parsing businesses’ tangential roles to a story with an expansive attain.

“You’re going to see scrutiny and the emergence of excellent actors versus negative actors from a provide chain standpoint,” he says. “It’s incumbent on excellent actors to point out their finest practices, but it is also incumbent on individuals to not be negative actors.”

…This Consists of Licensing Arrangements

“Who could potentially get caught up in [litigation], I feel, is a excellent query as properly,” Crow says, “because the way that lots of of the providers are [set up], and this is not news, is that you are expanding to licensing arrangements. You can see your brand eviscerated if it is caught up in a dirty-kind pen or delivery method, or it gets [linked to] an edible that [causes] a negative outcome or an adverse consequence.”

Any connection to other brands or other providers is a hyperlink worth examining, even in extra relaxed instances that are not burdened with a national news story and a increasing count of sicknesses and deaths. Licensing agreements are, of course, incorporated in this.

“You’re genuinely placing a lot of trust in production providers that they are carrying out items correctly and properly in not violating state guidelines or adhering to the finest attainable typical that they could adhere to,” Crow says.

Bodamer adds an vital adhere to-up, reminding cannabis organizations to be conscious constantly of the federal government’s stance on cannabis: “That non-compliance across state lines also removes what would have been one particular of the … de facto protections from the federal prosecutorial standpoint, which is that if you are keep compliant, there’s significantly less of an interest in federal prosecution.”

Supply: One particular


Latest posts